<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BassFuzz.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bassfuzz.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bassfuzz.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the Low Fuzz, One Pedal at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:24:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Demo:  Malekko Chicklet Reverb by grygrx</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2010/01/18/video-demo-malekko-chicklet-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>grygrx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1092#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that it is now standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that it is now standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Demo:  Malekko Chicklet Reverb by JDK</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2010/01/18/video-demo-malekko-chicklet-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>JDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1092#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>So, just to clarify, has the mod that preserves bass been added to all of the newly made ones, or do you have to ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, just to clarify, has the mod that preserves bass been added to all of the newly made ones, or do you have to ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Demo:  Malekko Chicklet Reverb by Evan</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2010/01/18/video-demo-malekko-chicklet-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1092#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>The Malekko website mentions that the Chicklet is &quot;brickless,&quot; which likely refers to the Belton Digi-Log Reverb module that the Spring Chicken used. It&#039;s sometimes called a &quot;brick&quot; due to its size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Malekko website mentions that the Chicklet is &#8220;brickless,&#8221; which likely refers to the Belton Digi-Log Reverb module that the Spring Chicken used. It&#8217;s sometimes called a &#8220;brick&#8221; due to its size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Demo:  Malekko Chicklet Reverb by RC</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2010/01/18/video-demo-malekko-chicklet-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>RC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1092#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>true about the spring chicken - you have a source somewhere to indicate that the Chicklet uses a different unit? It seems unusual, especially since the SC is no longer available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true about the spring chicken &#8211; you have a source somewhere to indicate that the Chicklet uses a different unit? It seems unusual, especially since the SC is no longer available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Demo:  Malekko Chicklet Reverb by grygrx</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2010/01/18/video-demo-malekko-chicklet-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>grygrx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1092#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s similar for sure, but my understanding is the Spring Chicken used a reverb unit from another company and this is their own thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s similar for sure, but my understanding is the Spring Chicken used a reverb unit from another company and this is their own thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Demo:  Malekko Chicklet Reverb by RC</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2010/01/18/video-demo-malekko-chicklet-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>RC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1092#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>i was excited to check out malekko&#039;s new compact fuzz. Is it just me or is this a repackaged Spring Chicken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was excited to check out malekko&#8217;s new compact fuzz. Is it just me or is this a repackaged Spring Chicken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fuzz Review: D*A*M Meathead Dark by Cliff</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2009/11/02/fuzz-review-dam-meathead-dark/comment-page-1/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1047#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>Cool pedal, it sounds killer. Too bad these pedals are impossible to get, if you do know how let meknow will ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool pedal, it sounds killer. Too bad these pedals are impossible to get, if you do know how let meknow will ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fuzz Review: Sonic VI Champion Fuzz Unit by Dosi Y Anarchy</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2009/10/17/fuzz-review-sonic-vi-champion-fuzz-unit/comment-page-1/#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dosi Y Anarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=995#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>Great Demo Grygryx, im really glad that you&#039;ve started doing &#039;amped&#039; demo&#039;s  - I personally prefer to hear pedals played through amps, even though I do understand that they can add a great amount of colour to the tone which could make the demo unrepresentative.

Analogman should make you a pedal called King of Fuzz - then have a 3 year waiting list for anyone who wants one ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Demo Grygryx, im really glad that you&#8217;ve started doing &#8216;amped&#8217; demo&#8217;s  &#8211; I personally prefer to hear pedals played through amps, even though I do understand that they can add a great amount of colour to the tone which could make the demo unrepresentative.</p>
<p>Analogman should make you a pedal called King of Fuzz &#8211; then have a 3 year waiting list for anyone who wants one ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick and Easy &#8211; Bass Effect Holiday Shopping Guide 2009 by grygrx</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2009/12/01/quick-and-easy-bass-effect-holiday-shopping-guide-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>grygrx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1060#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>The two OD pedals I had in possession at the time I got it were the BJFE Blueberry Bass Overdrive and the Dredgetone Angler. 

IMHO the SFT is a more flexible than the BBBOD, while attempting similar things, and its range overlaps about 98% of what that pedal can do.  The one sound that it doesn&#039;t do is the &#039;wet blanket on amp&#039;, and frankly I don&#039;t like that much anyway (though some people might).  I sold the BBBOD after getting the SFT

The Angler is more nasal, and has a very limited number of settings that sound good to me.  I think those settings sound GREAT in a band context, and different enough that I&#039;ll be keeping it as well... as a backup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two OD pedals I had in possession at the time I got it were the BJFE Blueberry Bass Overdrive and the Dredgetone Angler. </p>
<p>IMHO the SFT is a more flexible than the BBBOD, while attempting similar things, and its range overlaps about 98% of what that pedal can do.  The one sound that it doesn&#8217;t do is the &#8216;wet blanket on amp&#8217;, and frankly I don&#8217;t like that much anyway (though some people might).  I sold the BBBOD after getting the SFT</p>
<p>The Angler is more nasal, and has a very limited number of settings that sound good to me.  I think those settings sound GREAT in a band context, and different enough that I&#8217;ll be keeping it as well&#8230; as a backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick and Easy &#8211; Bass Effect Holiday Shopping Guide 2009 by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bassfuzz.com/2009/12/01/quick-and-easy-bass-effect-holiday-shopping-guide-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassfuzz.com/?p=1060#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised grygrx liked the SFT so much the first time he plugged it in.  I was a little underwhelmed until I tried it out at band practice and heard how it sat in the mix.  I really love it now though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="list-style-type: none; border-top: 2px solid #003366; border-bottom: 2px solid #003366; background-color: #E1EFFC; color: red; padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px; margin: 10px 20px 0px 20px; ">
<p>I&#8217;m surprised grygrx liked the SFT so much the first time he plugged it in.  I was a little underwhelmed until I tried it out at band practice and heard how it sat in the mix.  I really love it now though</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
